The one-hour FastPass window at DAK
Two weekends ago, when I visited DAK, I saw the new FastPass tickets in use there. Gone are the thin, square paper versions. Now there's a thick paper version, shaped like a longer rectangle, that closely resembles Disneyland's FP tickets. There's a barcode (no one knows what for, but the privacy implications are troubling), the date stamp is much more visible, and there's more information.
One bit of information is when you can get another one. In my case, I got an early morning Everest FP and saw that although my return time was 3pm, my next FP window would open in an hour. Pleased, I got one an hour later at Safari. Hm. Oddly, that one had a return time in 1.5 hours, but I could get ANOTHER FP in sixty minutes. So when that time arrived, I got a FP for Dinosaur, and suddenly I was the holder of three FastPasses, all of them still yet to mature.
Unless I'm missing something, this is new. It used to be you were capped at the two-hour window, not one hour, and you could only hold two at a time, not three. Disneyland has long had networked and unnetworked machines, meaning locals who knew the system could have an advantage.
At first, I was annoyed by this sudden new complexity. But I thought about it and now I'm not so sure. It could very well be that this new system ends up being tourist friendly, which is what I always advocate (I'm not really an advocate for the locals, despite being one myself). Just how could it be tourist friendly? Because the info on getting another one is clear, large, and well-explained, it's likely tourists will finally take advantage of that. And the one-hour policy means more FP tickets will be gone in the EARLY part of the day, not the later part, and this too is tourist-friendly.
The jury is still out, of course (when is the jury never "out" on the subject of FastPass?!) but this isn't an instant negative. If tourists win, the system could yet prevail. Of course, what tourists want is a central FP bank that you visit at the start of the day at the start of the park. That would mean completely mapping out the day, though, and I'm not in favor of that, even if the tourists want it. The tourists might like gambling and stripper halls too, but I think Disney should avoid giving them some things they might profess to want.
One bit of information is when you can get another one. In my case, I got an early morning Everest FP and saw that although my return time was 3pm, my next FP window would open in an hour. Pleased, I got one an hour later at Safari. Hm. Oddly, that one had a return time in 1.5 hours, but I could get ANOTHER FP in sixty minutes. So when that time arrived, I got a FP for Dinosaur, and suddenly I was the holder of three FastPasses, all of them still yet to mature.
Unless I'm missing something, this is new. It used to be you were capped at the two-hour window, not one hour, and you could only hold two at a time, not three. Disneyland has long had networked and unnetworked machines, meaning locals who knew the system could have an advantage.
At first, I was annoyed by this sudden new complexity. But I thought about it and now I'm not so sure. It could very well be that this new system ends up being tourist friendly, which is what I always advocate (I'm not really an advocate for the locals, despite being one myself). Just how could it be tourist friendly? Because the info on getting another one is clear, large, and well-explained, it's likely tourists will finally take advantage of that. And the one-hour policy means more FP tickets will be gone in the EARLY part of the day, not the later part, and this too is tourist-friendly.
The jury is still out, of course (when is the jury never "out" on the subject of FastPass?!) but this isn't an instant negative. If tourists win, the system could yet prevail. Of course, what tourists want is a central FP bank that you visit at the start of the day at the start of the park. That would mean completely mapping out the day, though, and I'm not in favor of that, even if the tourists want it. The tourists might like gambling and stripper halls too, but I think Disney should avoid giving them some things they might profess to want.
2 Comments:
Maybe with all the changes that you mention on the physical FastPass, there are some other intrinsic ones as well.
If Disney is able to track them better and their use, maybe they will be able to give out more FastPasses than before.
Also, if they can track them--they now how many are redeemed and how many aren't--maybe they can allow more to be distributed.
Thanks for the update! I got the link for this blog from the Disney Blog.
It would be interesting, the next time you're there, to have you grab two FP's for a single attraction. Are the barcodes identical? If you mind not using one of them and want to scan it and post it, I'd be happy to try and decode it. For example, if the barcode contains nothing but the attraction ID# and the time - that's not troubling from a privacy perspective. It's difficult to imagine a barcode that could FIT on a FastPass containing enough information to track individual users (e.g., your folio number or AP number). Even just assigning throwaway day-of IDs to individuals would require at least 4 barcode digits, which would take up a good deal of space. On the other hand, the barcode could be a unique ID for the FP itself - which means the back end could be tracking almost anything about you that it could get from your admission media (which I doubt - the quality of that data would be highly variable since some people are on MYW tix that they bought in advance and can't be identified through).
Post a Comment
<< Home